From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 10 1:19:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C3E37B400; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 01:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2A9ImG40496; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 04:18:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 04:18:48 -0500 From: Alan Eldridge To: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: gettext vs gettext-devel Message-ID: <20020310091848.GA40427@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20020310034141.GA16921@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <1015751079.509.9.camel@notebook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1015751079.509.9.camel@notebook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 11:08:42AM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >files. ports/devel/gettext-devel/pkg-plist is a stub, the real plist is >generated on the fly. Check ports/devel/gettext-devel/Makefile for >details. I caught that and corrected myself in a followup. It was the -plist that threw me off. >No, we can't use only one, because some ports only work with older one, >while some only with newer one, therefore we need both to make everyone >happy. That was basically what I wanted to know. But, if you'll indulge my curiosity: If you define WANT_FULL_GETTEXT, then they both produce libintl.so.1; are the two shared libs not compatible, or is it in the executables that the differences lie? Thanks. -- Alan Eldridge "Dave's not here, man." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message