From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 8 15:18:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FDD16CBFD for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbuechler@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E214143D4C for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:34:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cbuechler@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i31so322099wxd for ; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:34:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UeSy4E3SuRQK+XMwMh3vpzddQ2E9JIDXURR4ngEzfoUZBAHRGj41Sdhw0y47WIGUdU4ux5mLwPWE1eB05RNIJEQBXFUipYgZuojBD9ewAPuDYGHXesLIpKIL5eT+0Vpfz+3KChFpYIW39qB+r8uNtXLQLSlg4GNXwi2JVGdYA+0= Received: by 10.70.87.8 with SMTP id k8mr2077696wxb; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.12.16 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:34:16 -0400 From: "Chris Buechler" To: "Dominic Marks" In-Reply-To: <4459.195.12.22.194.1149757864.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44876071-491e@helpdesk.islandnet.com> <4459.195.12.22.194.1149757864.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf buggy on 6.1-STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:19:04 -0000 On 6/8/06, Dominic Marks wrote: > > I've experienced the same. If you have a lot of concurrent connections > going on it seems that every so often an connection will be blocked, > even if it doesnt match any rule. In my case I experienced this with > apache22 acting as a reverse proxy/virtual host. > This sounds a lot like the port randomization problems discussed by Michael Silbersack in his BSDCan presentation. specifically, pages 12-14. http://www.silby.com/bsdcan06/silbersack_bsdcan06.pdf That shouldn't be an issue anymore, but I don't know when that was resolved. cheers, -Chris