From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 18 01:20:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F221065670 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 01:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265D78FC08 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 01:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4I1KBDu055076 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 01:20:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4I1KBWR055075; Wed, 18 May 2011 01:20:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 01:20:11 GMT Message-Id: <201105180120.p4I1KBWR055075@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: neeraj verma Cc: Subject: Re: ports/151467: New port: sysutils/autojump acts as a complement to cd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: neeraj verma List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 01:20:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/151467; it has been noted by GNATS. From: neeraj verma To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, neeraj.verma.ports@vermatech.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/151467: New port: sysutils/autojump acts as a complement to cd Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:50 -0400 --000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for looking at my submission. Here are my comments: 1. I have fixed this. The comment line has been shortened. 2. the duplicated RUN_DEPENDS line is not actually duplicated. It is part of an IF ELSE statement. 3. I am not understanding what the reinvent of "NO_BUILD" macro means. Can you please elaborate? 4. I have fixed this. 5. I have fixed this. 6. I spoke to the author about fixing his version and package naming scheme. He said he will not change it so I had to change my PORTVERSION value to be non standard. Is that OK? Let me know your thoughts and I will post the modified files. --000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for looking at my submission. Here are my comments:

1. I have fixed this. The comment line has been shortened.
2. the duplicated RUN_DEPENDS line is not actually duplicated. It is part of an IF ELSE statement.
3. I am not understanding what the reinvent of "NO_BUILD" macro means. Can you please elaborate?
4. I have fixed this.
5. I have fixed this.
6. I spoke to the author about fixing his version and package naming scheme. He said he will not change it so I had to change my PORTVERSION value to be non standard. Is that OK?

Let me know your thoughts and I will post the modified files.
--000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5--