From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 11 02:55:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6EBA216A4CE; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 02:55:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 041F543D1F; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 02:55:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5B2rsN6049246;
	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:53:54 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i5B2rrQc049243;
	Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:53:53 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:53:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040611024817.GK78955@elvis.mu.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040610225158.44958E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_usrreq.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 02:55:03 -0000


On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> [040610 19:18] wrote:
> > 
> > Agreed.  If the caller doesn't mind us dropping the unp_mtx, the first
> > logical thing to try is to replace unp_gcing with an sx lock (or the
> > like), and only acquire unp_mtx when calling into code that needs it. 
> 
> That's not really needed.  The idea is just to avoid initiating another
> gc scan while one is in progress. 

It would almost be tempting to do that cleanup in a separate worker
(perhaps a callout), and just launch the cleanup using a cv when
necessary.  That would get all the work out of a context that probably
includes socket activity, etc. 

> I'll look at it if I find the time/motivation. 

Sounds good to me :-).  I'll move ahead with merging other stack locking
bits in the mean time.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research