From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 15:46:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298821065670 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BD78FC1B for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1JjG1S-000AWd-Dh; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:46:10 +0400 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <72854627@bb.ipt.ru> <200804072321.19332.aline@riseup.net> <20080408120026.582326h7ubg7rd40@webmail.leidinger.net> <51403695@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408165737.21116ohrt6c8pt44@webmail.leidinger.net> <15726112@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408172617.667132avjdqmc4ao@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:43:49 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20080408172617.667132avjdqmc4ao@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue\, 08 Apr 2008 17\:26\:17 +0200") Message-ID: <83563690@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: linux-f8 infrastructure ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:46:12 -0000 On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:26:17 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Ok, now that I think more about it, we did it like it is because it is > enough. In the package we have the generated file(s) I think, as we > don't expect other modules to be present before the install of the > gtk2 port. The question is, if this is even true in the update case (I > don't talk about the update from fc4 to f8, but about linux-gtk2-x to > linux-gtk2-(x+1)). As I understand it is enough for now. > Do we have a port with such modules? Will we have > one in the future (I would like to see some more engines supported, if > f8 doesn't come with some more by default)? Which engines you would like to see by default with f8? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve