From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 13:52:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CE4106564A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F54C8FC15 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BEBD23C25 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:50 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.17 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90208D23C0C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4F3D0A37.2060001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:55 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F3CFC7F.3000900@secnap.com> <10470607.4oSeArzyYA@pcoliver.heesakkers.info> In-Reply-To: <10470607.4oSeArzyYA@pcoliver.heesakkers.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Making 8.3 packaged ports 'pretty'... and INSTALL_ICONS macro. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:52:51 -0000 On 2/16/12 8:33 AM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > You committed the patch I wrote in ports/164344. > I remember that. and the discussion then was 'don't do that' :-) because, it is 'undefined', as in 'sorta random'. some systems will run the gtk cache, some won't, and some will run it depending on if gnome is installed before the port, but won't run it if after. This also causes problems with package building, if package is built on a different box (one with) , and installed on a box 'without', there are problems. so, I think I will avoid the if exists for now. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell