From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 22 3:26:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAD014C35 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 03:26:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA67431; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:08:06 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:08:06 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Oscar Bonilla , Kris Kennaway , "David E. Cross" , Joe Abley , Wes Peters , Mike Smith , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAM & LDAP in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3795EEB9.1A21EEA@newsguy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > I perceive here an unfair biasing toward nss. Someone mentioned > defining where to get the passwords from based on the login class. > This is a very interesting option, that doesn't seem to be well > served by nss. there is already nss_ldap module for NSS to get all the stuff from LDAP that's why NSS is better (for me) than other solutions /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message