From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 13 14:01:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AF016A41C; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:01:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from rodan.vipstructures.com (rodan.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C853B43D1F; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:01:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.vipstructures.com [127.0.0.1]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5AA1EE835; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:01:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mothra.vipstructures.com (mothra.vipstructures.com [192.168.1.3]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30151EE828; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:01:48 -0400 (EDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:02:20 -0400 Message-ID: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456EA38@VIP10-WIN2K> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? Thread-Index: AcVwHbd83qCJBi56RbyKSrd3Z/hYpwAAk9Fg From: "Toll, Eric" To: Cc: Francisco , freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:01:50 -0000 > Subject: RE: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? >=20 > Toll, Eric p=ED=B9e v po 13. 06. 2005 v 09:27 -0400: >=20 > > I *did* put quite a lot of info into the notes, but they > (the person=20 > > updating the HTML) truncated it to: "SATA untested" for the=20 > Gigabyte=20 > > board I submitted (GA-7A8DW) -- I had a small paragraph of notes to=20 > > include which again were *truncated*. >=20 > That person was me. Honestly, the rest of your submission was=20 > about parts you plugged into the board, which obviously does=20 > not belong into the _motherboard_ entry. >=20 > If people feel like we should have RAID cards on=20 > FreeBSD/amd64 list, we should start one :) Hmm, if the reason that a particular component on the MB was untested was due to a known existing glitch *and* a workround/improvement is provided then I feel it should be listed. Thanks for helping out with the AMD64 project. I appreciate your efforts. Kind Regards, Eric