From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 6 15:25:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E78106568E for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 15:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: from ibctech.ca (v6.ibctech.ca [IPv6:2607:f118::b6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA3208FC18 for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 15:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 91301 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2009 15:27:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?IPv6:2607:f118::5?) (steve@ibctech.ca@2607:f118::5) by 2607:f118::b6 with ESMTPA; 6 May 2009 15:27:04 -0000 Message-ID: <4A01ABE5.5000508@ibctech.ca> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 11:25:25 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: af300wsm@gmail.com References: <0016361e896051401204693fcf74@google.com> In-Reply-To: <0016361e896051401204693fcf74@google.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Odhiambo_=3F=3F=3F?=, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3F=3F?= , John Nielsen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuring an IPv6 router to assign addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:25:39 -0000 af300wsm@gmail.com wrote: > On May 6, 2009 8:56am, John Nielsen wrote: >> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 10:39:24 am Odhiambo ワシントン wrote: > > >> Is there a reason you need to control the addresses used by your clients > >> (other than the prefix)? I set up IPv6 on my LAN and while I have DHCPd > >> running on the router for IPv4 addresses rtadvd is all I needed for IPv6. > >> Clients assign themselves addresses based on the network prefix they > >> learn from route solicitation and their own MAC address. That's supposed > >> to be one of the "reduced administration" benefits of the new > >> protocol. :) > > > Thanks for reminding me of the flow in which this happens. Seems like I, > at sometime, got the idea that it was the router that dished back a > unique IP based on clients MAC and so forth. However, it seems to me now > that the router was only supposed to dish out the prefix, ie network id, > and the client would take that prefix and generate a unique IP based on > its MAC. Have a peruse of this RFC (stateless autoconfig): http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4862.txt Steve