From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 10 00:42:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CC116A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 00:42:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9C043D45 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 00:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mspitze1@optonline.net) Received: from bogomips.optonline.net (ool-18bd2db1.dyn.optonline.net [24.189.45.177]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with SMTP id <0I0M00LE61Y3GX@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:42:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:41:57 -0400 From: Marc Spitzer In-reply-to: <20040709142246.30a96c9f.djb@unixan.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Message-id: <20040709204157.5f1f539f@bogomips.optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <40EECA19.3925.EDD9BBEB@localhost> <20040709142246.30a96c9f.djb@unixan.com> Subject: Re: bash as a login shell (was Root users shell == no existantshell /bin/bash) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 00:42:12 -0000 On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:22:46 -0700 Daniel Brown wrote: > When you prefer to use a shell every single time, then having to type > 'bash' is an unnecessary bother every time. This is more so when you > work in a group of admins -- some people are less tolerant of manually > entering a different shell than others. > > To be honest, also, it's not always very obvious which shell you log > into at first. Just going to the right shell in the first place > removes the confusion. ok, but when was bash declared the right shell for the job? marc