From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 23:12:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540EF16A46C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C46613C480 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5JMlqiN004985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:47:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <46785D17.1010804@tundraware.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:47:51 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interesting Change In ssh Behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:12:20 -0000 youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> >> >>>> What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!): >>> >>> Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing >>> >>> >>> This is on an old 4.11 system updated to latest stable. xauth does >>> indeed exist in: >>> >>> /usr/X11R6/bin/xauth >>> >>> >>> Very strange ... >> >> >> And now .... the answer: >> >> doing a 'strings sshd' returns the fact that it thinks (on this >> latest build of 4.11-STABLE) that >> xauth lives in /bin ! >> >> I did an ln -s /usr/X11R6/..../xauth /bin/xauth and everythingworks >> again. >> >> So .. is this a bug or a new "feature" ????? > > The /usr/X11R6 search path was removed recently in CURRENT. Coincidence? > > -Garrett Yabut this is 4.x - nothing is supposed to be changing ... or so I thought... Besides, on 6.x with xorg 7.2, the new path is in /usr/local. I dunno how it ended up looking in /bin. I've written up a PR, but given the unsupported status of 4.x, I doubt anyone will bother, especially given the simple workaround...