From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 08:51:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EC716A41F; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:51:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB4843D46; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:51:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7594B60FE; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:50:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA7260F8; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:50:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E421C33DD4; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:50:51 +0200 (CEST) To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <35184.1125657474@phk.freebsd.dk> <20050905134006.B73214@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20050907103416.GB91876@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050907124411.GB38943@comp.chem.msu.su> <20050907162712.GA3533@dragon.NUXI.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:50:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050907162712.GA3533@dragon.NUXI.org> (David O'Brien's message of "Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:27:12 -0700") Message-ID: <86y868ndsk.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no Cc: Dmitry Pryanishnikov , Yar Tikhiy , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: kern/85503: panic: wrong dirclust using msdosfs in RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:51:01 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:44:11PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > Second, the PR kern/85503 shouldn't be > > closed until the problem is fixed in all relevant branches: It > > should be put in the "patched" state instead according to the > > project's well-established policy. Thanks. > I've been a FreeBSD committer for almost 10 years now - what you claim is > "well established" isn't. When a patch from a PR is committed to head > the PR may be closed. The new practice of some committers to change the > state to patched is something some committers may like to do, but I > don't. It is the *documented policy* of the project and has been for several years. As a committer, you are expected to have read and understood the following document: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/pr-guidelines/article.html DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no