From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Tue Jun 12 12:45:41 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52CE100D3FC for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B96B8159B; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w5CCja1w033631; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 05:45:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w5CCjasC033630; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 05:45:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201806121245.w5CCjasC033630@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r334939 - head/stand/lua In-Reply-To: <20180612115105.GB75210@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 05:45:36 -0700 (PDT) CC: Warner Losh , Devin Teske , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Kyle Evans , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:45:41 -0000 > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:07:23AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > ... > > The last articulated plan in arch@ was that LUA will be default in 12, and > > we plan to remove FORTH in 13. Last time I said it there in February, there > > was only email agreeing that I could find. This matches the in-person > > consensus poll I took at BSDcan as well. I think it would take a very > > extraordinary set circumstance and severe problems with LUA to change those > > plans. > > For the idiots among us, what's wrong the with FICL-based loader(8) and why > is it being replaced with Lua one? The number of forth programmers on the planet has diminished to the point trying to maintain and/or enhance the FreeBSD boot loader by either the project or down stream projects and vendors has sadly approached the high pain threshold. Oddly, I now have to learn lua :-) Which is probably not a bad thing. Perhaps my limited forth understanding may become useful in 2037 <:-) -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org