From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 28 15:42:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA03673 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:42:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA03548; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:41:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id PAA27696; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808282240.PAA27696@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr CC: committers@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19980828212756.A26309@keltia.freenix.fr> (message from Ollivier Robert on Fri, 28 Aug 1998 21:27:56 +0200) Subject: Re: p5-* ports From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Ollivier Robert * According to Mark Murray: * > I am looking at the possibilities of SPAN.pm replacing the _entire_ * > */p5-* port collection. It is _very_ powerful. * * Be aware that CPAN doesn't solve the dependencies between packages. During * build you'll see that a few are missing (A require B and so on) but it * won't get them for you. * * I use CPAN a lot but it is not a miracle. Can someone tell me how this works? Also, are you guys (some of you anyway) suggesting to remove all the p5-* ports from the tree? (That's going to make the ports tree shrink by almost 100, but given the recent mess I'm not sure if I'll shed any tears. ;) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message