From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 09:57:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32A6A0B; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333B32D99; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s5J9vFtl046517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:57:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s5J9vFtl046517 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s5J9vFtl046517; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <53A2B3EA.9050701@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:56:58 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358364 - in head/misc: . valspeak References: <201406190824.s5J8Ol4D091003@svn.freebsd.org> <53A2A4C0.3050902@freebsd.org> <53A2A75E.9060507@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <53A2A75E.9060507@marino.st> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CMHQ0qSRGTRhpsmdADeqoSaR3WFVKDHBD" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:57:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CMHQ0qSRGTRhpsmdADeqoSaR3WFVKDHBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/19/14 10:03, John Marino wrote: > On 6/19/2014 10:52, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 06/19/14 09:24, John Marino wrote: >>> Author: marino >>> Date: Thu Jun 19 08:24:47 2014 >>> New Revision: 358364 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/358364 >>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r358364/ >>> >>> Log: >>> Add new port misc/valspeak (after 1.5 years wait) >>> =20 >>> This was submitted 3 Jan 2013. Thanks for your patience. I took t= he >>> liberty of proving stage support and allows CFLAGS from ports to pa= ss >>> to the vendor makefile. I also updated CONFLICTS to please portlin= t, >>> and removed the unnecessary Makefile patch by using ALL_TARGETS. >>> =20 >>> PR: 174940 >>> Submitted by: Sebastien Santoro >> >> valspeak was already in the ports as part of misk/talkfilters >> >=20 > Hi Matthew, > The port marks a conflict with talkfilters, so maybe this is > intentional? Is there a benefit to having it separately? These talkfilters are all fairly simple lex-based filter programs that make amusing substitutions in any piece of text fed through them. ie. a bunch of fairly small binaries. Unless the valspeak you just committed is different to the one in talkfilters -- which is entirely possible: IIRC these programs have been floating around the net since before the millenium, probably evolved a bit during that time -- then I don't think there's anything much to be gained from a separate port. Cheers, Matthew --CMHQ0qSRGTRhpsmdADeqoSaR3WFVKDHBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTorP7XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTndr0P/i6emPekueLxImcVCDWtgwd0 JM7a2UnADaiSP4cweZ0gjwe14MH8ViV0bEf7wmGEArjYZhC7SgRt31mfJzi/euXK cQzpOk3AcEELaU6c0g9neOv3+KITHnX+mId/I0E+ZOnUztxBJQQQJ95Oook1lF5f PK6m3vFd0fa+SxtoEbKWRm8SyuQlfh6MRl0FciVeYamdejQWM/Qn9cPNuP2Fh6nX DGJzeujfDIWJLsMiBDrrGk/yb6z7tqYNvhV/ToVDRbtfnC0q9ox0lnS4qD0LokUL NhAKIMv7TSj7XZsoCCYP8Y8e+nD13XIBwvl6BwBTce476jCvIBfOZWzKpn9z80BF 3suuJSyWrsMu+qs+GIoN2wdSVqwXgpkAUP543BCFnB/oWM+wV4OfYQAgf7eu2OzR wzZsrFTSkEOcpubjVS10Jj4qoVT4VFa6wY0jr63im9Hsvvu82He3ju3OOIJ8sJAA vcJn1MrIiv1w39915NA3p0rWjiQsgXQw8awNeUfKcC4tfqod5myhBGXwhlldC5kZ HcAejvRuyrsPoTz/MygXSsgcJqxBM6Gr/mv3AkbCXXPEsrViQJ46SWY+jEzb+NQq QlRDSHivTb+GtVP6lH4a5huH4iE+clrB8BnLOo5HfiHtny4cnqYLmH78rvRtnBeI GeSOxtbE5EGoiTy85zYD =eX5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CMHQ0qSRGTRhpsmdADeqoSaR3WFVKDHBD--