From owner-cvs-usrsbin Sun Mar 31 09:34:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-cvs-usrsbin Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA06576 for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Sun, 31 Mar 1996 09:34:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA06567 Sun, 31 Mar 1996 09:34:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA13028; Sun, 31 Mar 1996 09:33:21 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199603311733.JAA13028@precipice.shockwave.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) cc: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=), joerg@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/tzsetup Makefile main.c tzmenu.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 31 Mar 1996 18:22:18 +0200." <199603311622.SAA11793@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 09:33:20 -0800 From: Paul Traina Sender: owner-cvs-usrsbin@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: J Wunsch Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/tzsetup Makefile main.c tzmenu.c As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > . Removed the gross code that copied over the timezone file to > > /etc/localtime, and create a symlink now instead. > > Please, back it out. /etc/localtime supposed to work even in single-user > mode, when /usr/share not mounted! We have been shipping the system with the symlink for a long time, and nobody was complaining. Yes, they DID complain. That's why we changed it to a copy. Please don't take us through backwards steps. I don't back this out, the previous version was totally buggy and happily clobbered files under /usr/share/zoneinfo/ in case the existing /etc/localtime has already been a symlink. If the previous code was buggy, fix the previous code. Symlinking is much more obvious than copying the file (since you can examine the installed timezone setting with ``ls -l''), so unless there's a strong objection from much more than one person, i wouldn't change it again. Normally, i would it leave up to the local admin to decide whether to copy the file in preferance of the symlink. There's a strong objection from more than one person.