From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Sep 27 13:00:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA05633 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 13:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from java.dpcsys.com (java.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA05620 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 13:00:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by java.dpcsys.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id NAA25314; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 13:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 13:01:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow To: Harlan Stenn cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proxy natd and asymmetric cable modem routing In-Reply-To: <4788.906863545@brown.pfcs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, Harlan Stenn wrote: > I know that the default route goes out the modem port. > > So I still have natd do the proxy trick out the modem interface, as opposed > to my local network interface? Doh, I wasn't thinking very clearly. The natd requirement makes the obvious unworkable. One interface has to take care of both incoming and outgoing packets. You might be able to convince lo0 or your interior interface to handle this but I'm not sure how. Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 Dana Point Communications, a California corporation dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message