From owner-cvs-all Thu Jul 8 14:52: 4 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 664) id D61DA1514A; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19990708145202.05900@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:52:02 -0700 From: David O'Brien To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Sheldon Hearn , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux-base-5.2 - Imported sources Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <6514.931435144@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <3784953E.20F2005E@scc.nl> <19990708114649.A67400@dragon.nuxi.com> <3784FA51.639E1920@scc.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <3784FA51.639E1920@scc.nl>; from Marcel Moolenaar on Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 09:21:53PM +0200 X-Warning: Mutt Bites! X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > That's why the port is call linux-* instead of redhat-*. It's not RH > emulation, it's Linux emulation. We also don't need 2 ports (or more for Then drop the 5.2 a nd 6.0, because those are bogus version numbers for Linux then. > Fair enough. But don't come to me now with emulation specific comments, > because these should have been discussed before. On -emulation that is. I am bringing up Ports issues (which this is the first time these ports have been aired in a Ports environment). How libraries are laid out and which revs of libXfoo.so you include are -emulation issues. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message