Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:41:25 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-committers@freebsd.org, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r215070 - head/tools/tools/nanobsd
Message-ID:  <4CDA2275.1030403@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikP64BJ_y2aT8y6Pv0hFQp9MFi2kzENC_%2Bg2Xot@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201011100056.oAA0uimN067694@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTikP64BJ_y2aT8y6Pv0hFQp9MFi2kzENC_%2Bg2Xot@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  On 11/09/2010 18:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Warner Losh<imp@freebsd.org>  wrote:
>> Author: imp
>> Date: Wed Nov 10 00:56:44 2010
>> New Revision: 215070
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215070
>>
>> Log:
>>   Build make.conf when the world is not selected to build, but the
>>   kernel is.
>>
>>   PR:           151696
>>   Submitted by: lev@
>>
>> Modified:
>>   head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh
>>
>> Modified: head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh Wed Nov 10 00:39:42 2010        (r215069)
>> +++ head/tools/tools/nanobsd/nanobsd.sh Wed Nov 10 00:56:44 2010        (r215070)
>> @@ -917,6 +917,9 @@ else
>>   fi
>>
>>   if $do_kernel ; then
>> +       if ! $do_world ; then
>> +               make_conf_build
>> +       fi
>>         build_kernel
>>   else
>>         pprint 2 "Skipping buildkernel (as instructed)"
>      Funny that it overwrites __MAKE_CONF, but not SRCCONF (seems like
> the latter would infect a system more than the former *shrugs*); I
> think I understand why it's not set in this script though, because
> IIRC src.conf predates nanobsd.
>      I set my core variables and features in src.conf so I think it'd
> probably be better to block that out too.
>      Should I provide a patch for this item?
__MAKE_CONF is the root of all evil.  SRCCONF shouldn't affect anything 
if __MAKE_CONF is overriden.  If it does, then point me at the code in 
src that pulls it in?

Warner
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
>
>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDA2275.1030403>