Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:17:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: ac199@hwcn.org Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, tim@ppp6575.on.sympatico.ca, hoek@hwcn.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. Message-ID: <199710122117.OAA22153@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971012170418.2711C-100000@localhost> from "Tim Vanderhoek" at Oct 12, 97 05:10:52 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> But, really, there's not a big difference. Overflow the screen > with useless "disabled" messages and potentially miss an > important advisory, vs. forever running a kernel with a ball and > chain tied to its feet. I'd say "useless" ``disabled''... There's always scroll-lock and dmesg (heh: "Are there no work houses, are there no prisons?"). What about the schmuck who disables his wd driver and can't figure out why his machine won't boot? 8-). It's a two-edged sword. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710122117.OAA22153>