From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 20 16:53:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DB611815 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:53:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA00171; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:52:34 -0800 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:52:34 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@feral-gw Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Greg Lehey Cc: "Kenneth D. Merry" , paulz@trantor.xs4all.nl, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Slow seq. write on Seagate ST36530N In-Reply-To: <19990221111935.A93492@lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Saturday, 20 February 1999 at 17:21:19 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > Matthew Jacob wrote... > >> > >> If you're feeling kind, could you try and see if you could get a > >> performance curve related to the number of outstanding tags allowed? > > > > I will send him some diffs for camcontrol in a separate piece of mail that > > will enable him to change the number of tags on the fly. > > Now that sounds like a good idea. Do you plan to roll them into the > distribution camcontrol? > It sounds like a good idea, and it is. What I want to see is scsi_da use this automatically. I have never liked the "punch it, Chewey!" approach CAM has been taking..... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message