From owner-cvs-all Thu Feb 4 12:47:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA19088 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:47:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from veda.is (veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA19051; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 12:47:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adam@veda.is) Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA16638; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 20:47:29 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199902042047.UAA16638@veda.is> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC In-Reply-To: <199902042025.NAA06789@mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Feb 4, 99 01:25:04 pm" To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 20:47:28 +0000 (GMT) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, adam@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Including apm in the kernel build fixes the problem where on (some?) Pentium > > class CPUs the timekeeping gets hosed because there is something weird > > happening with the TSC that makes it unusable for keeping time. > > Then something is hosed up in the APM/timekeeping code, since this > *shouldn't* make a difference. Is PHK aware of this? It came up a few years ago and seems to have got buried in the pile. At least now there is an XXX to remind of it and warn that apm is still mandatory on some machines where not expected to be such. Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message