From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 24 9:46:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1235837B40E for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f7OGk0w07199; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:46:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@freebsd.org) To: kc5vdj@yahoo.com Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... In-Reply-To: <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com> References: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com> <20010823194003.C5214@xor.obsecurity.org> <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010824094600W.jkh@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:46:00 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 15 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: Jim Bryant Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:23:01 -0500 > Because of certain differences, it cannot be used wholesale as a > replacement for csh. Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention. This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when we first raised the issue of switching over, and nobody could come up with any concrete differences that would cause harm, so the deed was done. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message