Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:53:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 178357] [amd64] [patch] export CPU physical and virtual address sizes in sysctl oids using do_cpuid Message-ID: <bug-178357-17361-j3j003eHZj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-178357-17361@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-178357-17361@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D178357 Sofian Brabez <sbz@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Sofian Brabez <sbz@FreeBSD.org> --- Hi Oleksandr. Wow 2013, thanks for doing the triage! As John mentioned, the part about exposing them on linprocfs made sense. Si= nce I verified, it was implemented into sys/compat/linprocfs [1] with r317884 [= 2]=20 As Konstantin mentioned, it might break something in the other tier architectures and it's not really needed as we have already alternatives to gather CPU information.=20 Back in 2013, I remember my idea was to expose them through sysctl as MacOSX does under machdep.cpu but we don't have this oid tree in FreeBSD. I closed it. [1] https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/compat/linprocfs/linproc= fs.c#L298 [2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D317884 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-178357-17361-j3j003eHZj>