From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 3 1:43:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BCE37B401 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 01:43:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f738jRk01199; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 01:45:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200108030845.f738jRk01199@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: lists Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NewCard / pccbb In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:23:21 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 01:45:27 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Tried the patch, interesting thing, for some reason or other its always > routing the IRQ to the same IRQ as the realtek network card I have in > here, and with the patch in (before nothing worked at all on the pccbb), > now if the network card is in slot0 it doesnt work, and the wavelan does, > if the wavelan comes first on the pcibus it doesnt work and the network > card does. For some reason it always seems to be trying to share an IRQ > between these 2, any reason for this? Yeah; that seems to be the way your system's interrupt routing is set up. Get http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/pir.c, build and run it and let's look at the output. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message