From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 03:27:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD1616A418 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1096E13C461 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBS3RQOj096696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:27:27 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id lBS3RQi2021404; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:27:26 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:27:26 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200712280327.lBS3RQi2021404@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: oceanare@pacific.net.sg In-reply-to: <47746AFA.5080008@pacific.net.sg> (message from Erich Dollansky on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:18:18 +0800) References: <26ddd1750712271246j14795cf3wf8e9727f0f7cc148@mail.gmail.com> <47746AFA.5080008@pacific.net.sg> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: mkhitrov@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking undesirable domains using BIND X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:27:29 -0000 > Has bind a visible advantage in the response time? Maybe not in response time, but certainly in centralisation: you only maintain one DNS instead of every machine. Olivier