From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Mon May 23 22:50:04 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C407EB47E73
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 23 May 2016 22:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@chthonixia.net)
Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C7E195C
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@chthonixia.net)
Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (cpe-69-203-154-142.nyc.res.rr.com
 [69.203.154.142])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE74E1E48E0
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 18:49:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:49:48 -0400
From: "J. Altman" <freebsd@chthonixia.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Regarding Sigil: bug, request for an added port, or something
 else?
Message-ID: <20160523224948.GD63089@whisperer.chthonixia.net>
References: <20160522004208.GB59766@whisperer.chthonixia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160522004208.GB59766@whisperer.chthonixia.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 22:50:04 -0000

Thank you, Matthew.

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 08:42:08PM -0400, J. Altman wrote:
> Greetings, listmembers...
> 
> I need to know what might be the best way to proceed for the following:
> 
> When starting Sigil (a port with no maintainer) the following two errors
> occur:
> 
> =================================================================
> 
> Embedded Python Error:
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> 
> File "/usr/local/share/sigil/python3lib/xmlprocessor.py", line 6, in <module>
> from sigil_bs4.builder._lxml import LXMLTreeBuilderForXML
> File "/usr/local/share/sigil/plugin_launchers/python/sigil_bs4/builder/_lxml.py",
> line 26, in <module> from lxml import etree
> 
> ImportError: No module named 'lxml'
> 
> error in xmlprocessor repairXML: -2:
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/local/share/sigil/python3lib/xmlprocessor.py", line 6,
> in <module> from sigil_bs4.builder._lxml import LXMLTreeBuilderForXML
> 
> File "/usr/local/share/sigil/plugin_launchers/python/sigil_bs4/builder/_lxml.py",
> line 26, in <module> from lxml import etree
> 
> ImportError: No module named 'lxml'
> 
> ===============================================================
> 
> Then Sigil starts; a core is (sometimes) dumped. And not just any
> old core, it seems:
> 
> du -ch sigil.core 
> 1.1G	sigil.core
> 1.1G	total
> 
> When I asked at Mobile Read forums, for Sigil support, it seems that
> Sigil needs lxml for Python 3; where the lxml in the ports tree is
> py27-lxml-3.5.0.
> 
> Would this be considered a bug, or a ports request? It seems that it's
> a ports request, at this point. I assume that such a request goes to
> ports@, or to the maintainer of py27-lxml-3.5.0?
> 
> OTOH, I have no idea if lxml for Python 3 is the solution.
> 
> Thanks for any assitance, and best regards,
> 
> Joe
> 
>