From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 20:48:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069C416A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:48:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (duchess.speedfactory.net [66.23.201.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65B3A43D49 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ups@tree.com) Received: (qmail 29297 invoked by uid 89); 9 Nov 2004 20:48:45 -0000 Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (66.23.201.84) by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 9 Nov 2004 20:48:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 29208 invoked by uid 89); 9 Nov 2004 20:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO palm.tree.com) (66.23.216.49) by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 9 Nov 2004 20:48:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.tree.com [127.0.0.1]) by palm.tree.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA9Kmh5R036123; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:48:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ups@tree.com) From: Stephan Uphoff To: Alfred Perlstein In-Reply-To: <20041109201954.GO24892@elvis.mu.org> References: <1100024464.29384.30.camel@palm.tree.com> <1100025632.29384.54.camel@palm.tree.com> <20041109201954.GO24892@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1100033323.29384.126.camel@palm.tree.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:48:43 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:49:31 +0000 cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: John Baldwin cc: Alan Cox cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Mike Silbersack cc: Scott Long cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Robert Watson cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 pmap.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:48:50 -0000 On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 15:19, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Stephan Uphoff [041109 10:43] wrote: > > > > Caugh, caugh ... yes that would be a fine name .... caugh, caugh > > Don't feel too bad, the original spl mechanism would talk to the > hardware, what you mentioned was an optimization that spl didn't > get until later. No that is not it - the funny part was that I was fully aware of the old spl optimizations having looked at them extensively in NetBSD. Guess I should drink more coffee ;-) Stephan