Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:41:22 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, Devin Butterfield <dbutter@wireless.net>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>, Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sysadmin article Message-ID: <20010615144121.B94445@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <3B29D0BF.5D6BE93E@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 02:09:19AM -0700 References: <20010615001400.L23791-100000@achilles.silby.com> <3B29D0BF.5D6BE93E@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 02:09:19AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Rather than a tuned configuration, what would be useful is > > a script that would evaluate a system and give tuning hints. > > This might be simple for someone familiar with shell scripting > > or perl. It could do something like: > > [ ... Eliza program for FreeBSD ... ] > > Doing this is non-trivial. Many of the things they should > have tuned can not be tuned except at compile time. And Mike did not imply this tuning could be done without recompiling. As a matter of fact, one of the suggestions in his example involved the words 'change to X and recompile'. G'luck, Peter -- I've heard that this sentence is a rumor. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010615144121.B94445>