From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Dec 9 12:39:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3760537B416; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:39:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB9Kiqe01497; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:44:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200112092044.fB9Kiqe01497@mass.dis.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Matthew Dillon , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed auto-sizing patch to sysinstall (was Re: Using a larger block size on large filesystems) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:28:32 PST." <38952.1007929712@winston.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 12:44:52 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > It's not even like the debate lasted all that long - 2 days is all > it took for Matt to go "screw you guys, I'm committing the change" > and that was that. I'm not entirely enthused by this. But... > Yeah, I'm annoyed by it, and if the intention was to annoy me enough > to commit my own more comprehensive set of changes over Matt's then > maybe you guys are more clever than I thought because your plan seems > to be working! :) ... this sounds like a better solution is in the works, which is a Good Thing. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message