From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 10 09:28:47 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DC31065673;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:28:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net)
Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA11A8FC0C;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:28:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net)
Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71])
	by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3623C41C615;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:10:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de
Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27])
	by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 52ZzB2rBQcmu; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:10:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66)
	id D762941C62F; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:10:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net
	[10.111.66.10])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF4D4448DD;
	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net
To: Qing Li <qingli@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200812100740.mBA7eqjO034924@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20081210090429.G97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
References: <200812100740.mBA7eqjO034924@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: last call for L2/L3 rewrite code review
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:28:48 -0000

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Qing Li wrote:

Hi,

> It's becoming increasingly difficult to maintain a separate
> branch (p4 or svn) due to the high volume of new features'
> related commits. The integration and unit testing efforts
> increase in complexity by the week.

[..]

> I would like to commit the code within
> a week if not sooner.


I think waiting another few days would be good, so end of the weekend
or something seems realistic, but not so before.
The reason I am asking is that people are still seeing panics from
the rnh locking and aren't even able to boot machines. Mixng route
locking bugs with this rewrite will be painful. As I hope that the
rnh bugs will be solved within 2-3 days things would be good for
getting this monster in:)


> The complete P4 project tree is located at
>
>    //depot/projects/arp-v2
>
> The full project sits in the svn branch that is located at
>
>    svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/arpv2_merge_1

Which of the two is the one to track the next days or are you going to
keep them in sync?


/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                      The greatest risk is not taking one.