Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:52:51 -0700 From: Jie Gao <jeffgaofreebsd@gmail.com> To: Michael Schuh <michael.schuh@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why was /etc/defaults/make.conf not updated Message-ID: <639522fe041106105246f17d09@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1dbad315041105103742459281@mail.gmail.com> References: <1dbad315041105103742459281@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could be many reasons, e.g.: You didn't do a mergemaster while upgrading the base system, or you upgrade from 4.x to 5.x, which no longer has /etc/defaults/make.conf ... But either case, looking at /usr/src/UPDATING and /usr/ports/UPDATING is a good idea. On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:37:14 +0100, Michael Schuh <michael.schuh@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > ich have found an entry in /usr/local/ports/UPDATING, that the > Variable XFREE_VERSION in /etc/make.conf was outdated and changed. > So we shall use X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg. > > I have searched an representing entry in /usr/src/etc/defaults/make.conf, > and it is not shown. Now i have also shown that the XFree4.4-ports are marked > as IGNORE. And i questioning me self why is the /etc/defaults/make.conf > not changed. I have already read that the change should coming. > > Is this the right sign to change to Xorg's XFree? > > Has anyone an information when this come true, or when the change was > maked in /usr/src/etc/defaults/make.conf? > > The reason to change to Xorg is clearly for me, may not why the > defaults/make.conf isn't already changed. > > Thanks to all and > best regards > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?639522fe041106105246f17d09>