Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:52:51 -0700
From:      Jie Gao <jeffgaofreebsd@gmail.com>
To:        Michael Schuh <michael.schuh@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: why was /etc/defaults/make.conf not updated
Message-ID:  <639522fe041106105246f17d09@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1dbad315041105103742459281@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1dbad315041105103742459281@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could be many reasons, e.g.:

You didn't do a mergemaster while upgrading the base system,

or you upgrade from 4.x to 5.x, which no longer has /etc/defaults/make.conf

...

But either case, looking at /usr/src/UPDATING and /usr/ports/UPDATING
is a good idea.


On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:37:14 +0100, Michael Schuh
<michael.schuh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ich have found an entry in /usr/local/ports/UPDATING, that the
> Variable XFREE_VERSION in /etc/make.conf was outdated and changed.
> So we shall use X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg.
> 
> I have searched an representing entry in /usr/src/etc/defaults/make.conf,
> and it is not shown. Now i have also shown that the XFree4.4-ports are marked
> as IGNORE. And i questioning me self why is the /etc/defaults/make.conf
> not changed. I have already read that the change should coming.
> 
> Is this the right sign to change to Xorg's XFree?
> 
> Has anyone an information when this come true, or when the change was
> maked in /usr/src/etc/defaults/make.conf?
> 
> The reason to change to Xorg is clearly for me, may not why the
> defaults/make.conf isn't already changed.
> 
> Thanks to all and
> best regards
> 
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?639522fe041106105246f17d09>