Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:47:53 +0000 From: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poudriere friendly armv7 relases Message-ID: <20230320204753.GY2347@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfq-7hnEEEmpgAdBNYOgEcUCopngSV8Bh=Xzx_JnZaWXRA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfo7A6%2BzB%2B=Wx5Y9VYFCsSk=Aa%2B9657FxfG0whM-Wsx1kQ@mail.gmail.com> <20230320202847.GW2347@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfq-7hnEEEmpgAdBNYOgEcUCopngSV8Bh=Xzx_JnZaWXRA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:38:34PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:28=E2=80=AFPM Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wro= te: > > That said, I can take a look and see if we can package base.txz for > > armv7, however I would like to do some archaeology work here to be sure > > that the resultant output is not going to have unexpected behavior > > because of the userland not matching 100% the target SoC. > > >=20 > These days, everything FreeBSD builds is identical on supported harndware. > We assume the boards can do UEFI after whatever weird thing they > need to get that going, and all that crazy has been relegated to the > uboot ports, and no longer intrudes into how we build stand (though some > crazy people might build stand for such platforms, it's so niche (eg a > couple > of routers that don't run our binaries ever) at this point that we > shouldn't worry > about it for releases). >=20 > We've evolved to a point where the benefit for being able to build poudri= ere > jails from release artifacts out-weights the couple of users being slight= ly > inconvenienced on their legacy platforms (and it hasn't been clear those > platforms will ever be updated to 14). >=20 Ok, let's discuss this further after 13.2 is done. Note, we're about a month from the start of the 14.0 cycle, but it sounds to me that once a solution is in place, things should "just work" from that point. Glen --yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjRJAPC5sqwhs9k2jAxRYpUeP4pMFAmQYxngACgkQAxRYpUeP 4pM3iA/9EYvMYINM3Kpy18V20uVkjeoNzX1UTWZxRmqGzQhv04l7A8IWAoLPCW8D N6OFBcm4VlrMVleJ7KjZafC8cdwpHUbr7fg/0/YEs//HU5nhPe87YqzoVJYtwxGL 1EhJ0Shc2YqZC5sYvrV9qbunw6b+SsSoPgQ9BSj+CFTjf5DDY6iM5zOWsBo2f8j7 XrzBQxpYarYrKrbxlDwbZmGpQ7ObMZz08AeUuPx+bs1QzmT8hnflNLsdhGzBAQWy 2L9QR6EkuPcV8z6nE/UtsxM1s4Cgb7bSWjhtwe/QgEsBDwyBRRhtZSXox2/+1RRO CJYPTczICCv/TIuZDbpSPeZP9eDfRY1bwDwvM+LqPlevTSpHNTiJmqlt4T48O28z jZxl3sJ91xkPUeFk3DxscpX7a+QB9Q8bBww9mIyipCis7OLCRoF5fiuvnr1Wkckw RVrl9M4l9wHfYcH+8nKr39EAEKlPX8gAip3eUa6S3QwXrDMPakOQEc8PFU46BsvS YOd3HII6rRjcNpt5hebVBMyQjXsUBvSAP6l7cnBASQCPmfEKWbm3DVMKDXfk+Jro kJCnMb005MCMhOV/ii5FhQ2ppQN87M5PtGXssDqO9Y3nyRDAaxe/KNW+YRYFQmVD DcdJi2taG1i1Q4wR3pnYWq35Vhnl/aNTogEc65+uv5JgTjQD9Zs= =eDuW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20230320204753.GY2347>