From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 13 00:27:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1616916A468 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F8D13C48E for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 11978 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2007 00:27:24 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 13 Nov 2007 00:27:24 -0000 Message-ID: <4738EF14.2070403@chuckr.org> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:25:56 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <4738A3AC.8090804@otenet.gr> <20071112201409.600b152a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20071112162148.0F5E.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20071112162148.0F5E.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Ports with GUI configs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:27:34 -0000 Gerard wrote: > On November 12, 2007 at 03:14PM RW wrote: > > [ ... ] > >> Yes, but that doesn't work if you are doing a portupgrade -a, you then >> need to wrap the makes in a simple script, which is what I was referring >> to. Portmaster has something like this built-in. > > From man PORTUPGRADE(1): and my (twofold) point is that (1) this removes all real choices from the user, and (2) there is a perfectly good method that allows one to keep their own options, and still get all the good points of batch processing.