From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 16 01:07:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA13638 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 01:07:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp ([202.247.4.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA13633 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 01:07:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp) Received: from nwsl.mesh.ad.jp (localhost.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp [127.0.0.1]) by chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00616; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 17:38:20 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199812160838.RAA00616@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> To: gmarco@giovannelli.it cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAO Integration? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:19:31 +0100." <199812160811.JAA09348@scotty.masternet.it> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 17:38:19 +0900 From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I think in this way we have a dispersion of resources. > Surely we can have both, but perhaps in the double time we can have one, > which works, if both party cooperate to a single project. It is correct, But already exist two project, "newconfig" and "new-bus". Not yet agree integration of two projects. Already working "newconfig" people and "new-bus" people, in separate. Integrate effort is good; However, we can't integrate if "new-bus" people don't make a compromise. So, for a little while, we will work in separate. -- NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp nakagawa@jp.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message