From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 26 05:18:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4D816A417 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9EC13C46A for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l8Q5HJuP056929; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:17:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:17:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20070925.231718.-423889040.imp@bsdimp.com> To: eugen@kuzbass.ru From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20070925.231043.-345497328.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20070925.125124.74698669.imp@bsdimp.com> <46F9DC89.598B7C64@kuzbass.ru> <20070925.231043.-345497328.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:17:19 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/91546: [umodem] [patch] Nokia 6630 mobile phone does notwork X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:18:11 -0000 In message: <20070925.231043.-345497328.imp@bsdimp.com> "M. Warner Losh" writes: : In message: <46F9DC89.598B7C64@kuzbass.ru> : Eugene Grosbein writes: : : Warner Losh wrote: : : > : : > Have you tried porting -current's umodem driver back to stable? I : : > think it would work a lot better... : : : : I've glanced at CURRENT's umodem and there is no that code : : allowing to work with devices without CM descriptor using UNION instead... : : NetBSD has that code since 2005. : : : : Do you think CURRENT's umodem would be useble in this case? : : My modem doesn't have a CM descriptor and I quirked it before. I : removed the quirk code and it works now without it. The Union code : from NetBSD didn't look relevant at all when you chased down all the : things that it actually did, but maybe I missed something. : : Given that umodem from current should just work on -stable w/o any : changes (you may need ucom too, which does need one or two changes), : it would be worth a shot at trying it. If that doesn't work, btw, I'll port the union code over. Warner