From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 17 2:58:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0E837B401 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail5.sea.registeredsite.com (mail5.sea.registeredsite.com [66.111.73.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC0B43EA9 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:58:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) Received: from asarian-host.net (asarian-host.net [216.122.74.112]) by mail5.sea.registeredsite.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBHAw4Z3013193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:58:05 -0500 Comments: To protect the identity of the sender, certain header fields are either not shown, or masked. Anonymous email addresses for asarians can be requested by filling in the appropriate form at: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi Received: (from root@localhost) by asarian-host.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) id gBHAw4366654 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:58:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) Posted-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:58:04 +0100 (CET) From: Mark Message-Id: <200212171058.GBHAW1M66636@asarian-host.net> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:57:52 +0100 X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net Subject: Re: Upload substantially slower than download X-Trace: pXpjdcXVeFYykRm31d16wFSUr2AlRNVfakgT6kKxENOBp8/1aVFmvewh39GCaKUh X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: Cc: References: <200212170027.GBH0RUW29189@asarian-host.net><1040085387.86677.105.camel@asarian-host.net><1040109376.86677.125.camel@asarian-host.net> <1040118446.86677.157.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUAPf8DPDFqW1BleBN9AQGpNAf/ezYRcgIJI5e5tL6wxFpEg18krQB6gmeT sHfVivcaGCCEF5y4mI/lkaSJros930i4aXy8oAEdt8EWh/jIXq0Pps6FKG+TfhOi K3BBcpueD5IAUrLemjUYMcVqJAU7xrC4DYP/NadEvBIWpDe5MnLDzMVYMlLAkIPS 2qtYhcB+aqpjJlNt1uSh7clMOAxWtzePZov/qO4gjShWtOrxT4H6Zc6LvmBR1LSM jqgyiy/s8v1+LI2tZh9Y7d1u8x/fgtzYr4nbSxp2E1nCF891gyUsn13FECK3qbL/ oQZYR13ELMARJpvJGsGD64B0BgTEU16fQ4yHS+fAY55zML17G6dr5A== =P0kh Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stacey Roberts" To: "Mark" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Upload substantially slower than download > Hi Mark, > Thanks for the output. Dear Stacey, Thank you for your excellent way of explaining the intricacies of tcpdump. :) > If its an ftp transfer then please try specify the port number (21) > and re-run the test transfers. Well, it showed nothing on port 21 -- I presume because data goes over port 22. But your remark is quite perceptive nonetheless, as I suddenly realized I am not doing FTP; that is, not directy: SSH2 is doing FTP. So, I dropped SecureFX out of SSH2 mode; and lo and behold, uploads are now around ~1800K/s! :) Rather peculiar; but a relief nonetheless, as, at least I know the likelihood of having to deal with some spurious hardware problem has decreased. > To verify: > test-server.net is the FBSD box > 192.168.79.3 is the WinXP box True. --------------------------------------------- 11:40:18.067571 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57948117:57949577(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.067599 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57949577 win 58400 (DF) 11:40:18.067693 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57949577:57951037(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.067817 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57951037:57952497(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.067843 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57952497 win 56940 (DF) 11:40:18.067940 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57952497:57953957(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.067965 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57953957 win 58400 (DF) 11:40:18.068063 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57953957:57955417(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068186 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57955417:57956877(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068202 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57956877 win 56940 (DF) 11:40:18.068309 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57956877:57958337(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068333 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57958337 win 58400 (DF) 11:40:18.068432 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57958337:57959797(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068556 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57959797:57961257(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068576 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57961257 win 56940 (DF) 11:40:18.068678 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57961257:57962717(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068713 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57962717 win 58400 (DF) 11:40:18.068801 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: . 57962717:57964177(1460) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068861 192.168.79.3.3422 > test-server.net..iad1: P 57964177:57964824(647) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 11:40:18.068880 test-server.net..iad1 > 192.168.79.3.3422: . ack 57964824 win 57753 (DF) .... 11:45:55.518098 test-server.net..ssh > 192.168.79.3.3218: P 38601376:38601536(160) ack 659473 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:45:55.518157 192.168.79.3.3218 > test-server.net..ssh: . ack 38601376 win 16912 (DF) 11:45:55.518191 test-server.net..ssh > 192.168.79.3.3218: P 38601536:38601664(128) ack 659473 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:45:55.518271 test-server.net..ssh > 192.168.79.3.3218: P 38601664:38601824(160) ack 659473 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:45:55.518328 192.168.79.3.3218 > test-server.net..ssh: . ack 38601664 win 16624 (DF) 11:45:55.518378 test-server.net..ssh > 192.168.79.3.3218: P 38601824:38601984(160) ack 659473 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:45:55.518453 test-server.net..ssh > 192.168.79.3.3218: P 38601984:38602112(128) ack 659473 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:45:55.518515 192.168.79.3.3218 > test-server.net..ssh: . ack 38601984 win 16304 (DF) 11:45:55.518555 test-server.net..ssh > 192.168.79.3.3218: P 38602112:38602160(48) ack 659473 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 11:45:55.518672 192.168.79.3.3218 > test-server.net..ssh: . ack 38602160 win 16128 (DF) 99927 packets received by filter 135 packets dropped by kernel --------------------------------------------- Hmm, is the packet-loss something I need to worry about? About a 0.14% packet loss. Although I do not see why any packet should be lost (or are they?), this can still not account for the discrepancy between ~1800K/s upload vs. 2700K/s download. But I can live with speeds like that. :) Thanks again for all your help, and to all others who contributed. - Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message