From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Apr 18 13:15:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA03608
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA03599
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 13:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with SMTP id VAA01382
	  ; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 21:12:37 +0100 (BST)
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
cc: Nik Clayton <nik@blueberry.co.uk>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: NFS and NIS between two 2.1-STABLE machines 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:26:48 EDT."
             <Pine.NEB.3.93.960418152610.6921J-100000@freebsd.ki.net> 
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 21:12:37 +0100
Message-ID: <1380.829858357@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

"Marc G. Fournier" wrote in message ID
<Pine.NEB.3.93.960418152610.6921J-100000@freebsd.ki.net>:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 1996, Gary Palmer wrote:
> 	Ack...POP? :(  Grab a copy of Pine, and use IMAP for mail off
> of one central mail spool.  Nice and clean :)

What if you don't like Pine? :-) Don't think MH understands IMAP. POP
is a much better supported protocol AFAIK.

Gary