From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Mar 17 9:42:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from moby.geekhouse.net (moby.geekhouse.net [64.81.6.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F8537B718 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:42:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@dhcp152.geekhouse.net [192.168.1.152]) by moby.geekhouse.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2HHiX189291; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:44:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:42:00 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 17-Mar-01 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:31 PM -0800 3/16/01, John Baldwin wrote: >>On 16-Mar-01 Chris Faulhaber wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 01:59:36PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> Is this in the FAQ yet? >> >> >>> >>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/FAQ/admin.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE >> >>Woo, cool. Then it seems people aren't using the resources >>normally available to them either in the form of mailing lists >>or the FAQ. I'm not sure we need to sacrifice our release >>engineering process for the sake of people doing cvsup upgrades >>that can't be bothered to either read the mailing lists or look >>in the FAQ. :( In case you haven't seen the previous posts in this thread, I have said that PRERELEASE was ok (though the same clueless people will probably gripe about it as well) and that I was arguing for _not_ completely taking this away. -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message