From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 14 11:39:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FDC16A446 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@hardy.tmseck.homedns.org) Received: from smtp3.netcologne.de (smtp3.netcologne.de [194.8.194.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4346C43D53 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:39:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas@hardy.tmseck.homedns.org) Received: from laurel.tmseck.homedns.org (xdsl-213-196-255-57.netcologne.de [213.196.255.57]) by smtp3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 270B4675B3 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 13:39:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 24817 invoked from network); 14 May 2006 11:39:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hardy.tmseck.homedns.org) (192.168.1.2) by 0 with SMTP; 14 May 2006 11:39:44 -0000 Received: from hardy.tmseck.homedns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hardy.tmseck.homedns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4EBdKP2038837; Sun, 14 May 2006 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from thomas@hardy.tmseck.homedns.org) Received: (from thomas@localhost) by hardy.tmseck.homedns.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4EBdDY4038836; Sun, 14 May 2006 13:39:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from thomas) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200605141139.k4EBdDY4038836@hardy.tmseck.homedns.org> From: tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas-Martin Seck) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060513211306.GG714@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports,gmane.os.freebsd.questions X-Attribution: tms Cc: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: Has the port collection become to large to handle. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 11:39:33 -0000 * Peter Jeremy : > On Sat, 2006-May-13 21:39:46 +0100, Shaun Amott wrote: >>If bandwidth really is a problem, then it is possible - but not >>necessarily a good idea - to check out individual ports via CVS. > > This is not supported. If you want to build ports from source, > you _must_ have a complete and consistent ports tree. Otherwise > you are on your own. If one wants to checkout only the necessary bits of the ports tree via CVS, des' porteasy script is worth a try (it's found in misc/porteasy).