Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:21:20 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <20080612112120.d1b8d059.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20080612070126.GF7250@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <3C916EEA-5A2B-4C88-B834-0F47D7D525FA@gmail.com> <20080611092457.82c83083.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080612032228.GD7250@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080612085810.072d705d.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080612070126.GF7250@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:01:26 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY> > I already did simple benchmarking by using "dd if=/dev/zero PY> > of=file" which gave me several 10s of MByte/s under all PY> > circumstances. Can you recommend one of the benchmarking programs PY> > for more detailed testing? PY> Try netperf or iperf in ports/benchmark. The machine in question as client: ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 130.75.117.1, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 32.5 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 130.75.117.112 port 56513 connected with 130.75.117.1 port 5001 [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 211 MBytes 177 Mbits/sec On the server side: ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local 130.75.117.1 port 5001 connected with 130.75.117.112 port 56513 [ 4] 0.0-10.3 sec 211 MBytes 172 Mbits/sec As server: ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local 130.75.117.112 port 5001 connected with 130.75.117.1 port 53843 [ 4] 0.0-10.1 sec 399 MBytes 331 Mbits/sec On the client side: ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 130.75.117.112, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 32.5 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 130.75.117.1 port 53843 connected with 130.75.117.112 port 5001 [ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 399 MBytes 331 Mbits/sec Hm, being a server seems to work better? The machine on the other side is also having a re-interface and usually transfers data with 20-30MByte/s. The ITX machine I'm testing is using both of it's re-interfaces in a lagg-configuration right now (laggproto loadbalance). Is this the expected performance? cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080612112120.d1b8d059.gerrit>