From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 23:11:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23373106566C for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vps.rulingia.com (host-122-100-2-194.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4B78FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.rulingia.com (c220-239-249-137.belrs5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.249.137]) by vps.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7CNBTZu075886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:11:29 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7CNBMuc021745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:11:23 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7CNBMxk021744 for freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:11:22 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Resent-From: Peter Jeremy Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:11:22 +1000 Resent-Message-ID: <20120812231122.GK20453@server.rulingia.com> Resent-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Received: from vps.rulingia.com (host-122-100-2-194.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.194]) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6L8KBJm005198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 18:20:12 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.189]) by vps.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6L8KBDH096067 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 18:20:11 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from c122-106-171-246.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c122-106-171-246.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.171.246]) by mail08.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q6L8Jntq020790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Jul 2012 18:19:51 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith In-Reply-To: <500A2565.9090009@missouri.edu> Message-ID: <20120721181204.A1702@besplex.bde.org> References: <20120714120432.GA70706@server.rulingia.com> <20120717084457.U3890@besplex.bde.org> <5004A5C7.1040405@missouri.edu> <5004DEA9.1050001@missouri.edu> <20120717200931.U6624@besplex.bde.org> <5006D13D.2080702@missouri.edu> <20120718205625.GA409@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <500725F2.7060603@missouri.edu> <20120719025345.GA1376@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <50077987.1080307@missouri.edu> <20120719032706.GA1558@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5007826D.7060806@missouri.edu> <5007AD41.9070000@missouri.edu> <20120719205347.T2601@besplex.bde.org> <50084322.7020401@missouri.edu> <20120720035001.W4053@besplex.bde.org> <50085441.4090305@missouri.edu> <20120720162953.N2162@besplex.bde.org> <20120720184114.B2790@besplex.bde.org> <50097128.6030405@missouri.edu> <20120721032448.X5744@besplex.bde.org> <5009BD6C.9050301@missouri.edu> <20120721123522.T877@besplex.bde.org> <500A2565.9090009@missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:56:00 +0000 Cc: Diane Bruce , Bruce Evans , John Baldwin , David Chisnall , Bruce Evans , Steve Kargl , David Schultz , Peter Jeremy , Warner Losh Subject: Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:11:30 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 18:19:49 +1000 (EST) X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:11:30 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 07/20/2012 10:34 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> >>> Bruce, with both of us working at the same time on clog, it is getting >>> hard for me to follow. The version I sent this morning is the last >>> change I made. >>> >>> How about if you come the owner of the code for a while. When you are >>> finished, send it back to me, and I will look over everything you have >>> done. I won't work on it until then. This works for me in other ways >>> too, because my life is very busy at the moment. >> >> I'd prefer you (or Somone Else) to keep working on it. I just plugged it >> into my test framework and started zapping errors... (I need to make my >> test framework easier to set up so that I don't have any investment in >> the not seeing the errors.) > > Do you have a piece of code after you made the changes? Or did you only > record the changes in the emails you sent to me? I was hoping that you could > send me a file as an attachment, with all your suggested changes. But if I > have to go through all the emails you sent in the last few days, I guess I'll > have to do that. I keep the code in a test program and copied it to the emails. I don't want to flood this thread with more copies of it yet :-), but won't lose it. In the old emails, it has my usual markup of '% ' indentation for code and no indentation for comments so that it can easily be extracted. Diffs would be unreadable since I reformatted everything. I was hoping you would reformat your version to KNF so that diffs can be small. Bruce