Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:11:30 -0000 From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@freebsd.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 Message-ID: <20120721181204.A1702@besplex.bde.org> Resent-Message-ID: <20120812231122.GK20453@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <500A2565.9090009@missouri.edu> References: <20120714120432.GA70706@server.rulingia.com> <20120717084457.U3890@besplex.bde.org> <5004A5C7.1040405@missouri.edu> <5004DEA9.1050001@missouri.edu> <20120717200931.U6624@besplex.bde.org> <5006D13D.2080702@missouri.edu> <20120718205625.GA409@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <500725F2.7060603@missouri.edu> <20120719025345.GA1376@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <50077987.1080307@missouri.edu> <20120719032706.GA1558@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5007826D.7060806@missouri.edu> <5007AD41.9070000@missouri.edu> <20120719205347.T2601@besplex.bde.org> <50084322.7020401@missouri.edu> <20120720035001.W4053@besplex.bde.org> <50085441.4090305@missouri.edu> <20120720162953.N2162@besplex.bde.org> <20120720184114.B2790@besplex.bde.org> <50097128.6030405@missouri.edu> <20120721032448.X5744@besplex.bde.org> <5009BD6C.9050301@missouri.edu> <20120721123522.T877@besplex.bde.org> <500A2565.9090009@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 07/20/2012 10:34 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> >>> Bruce, with both of us working at the same time on clog, it is getting >>> hard for me to follow. The version I sent this morning is the last >>> change I made. >>> >>> How about if you come the owner of the code for a while. When you are >>> finished, send it back to me, and I will look over everything you have >>> done. I won't work on it until then. This works for me in other ways >>> too, because my life is very busy at the moment. >> >> I'd prefer you (or Somone Else) to keep working on it. I just plugged it >> into my test framework and started zapping errors... (I need to make my >> test framework easier to set up so that I don't have any investment in >> the not seeing the errors.) > > Do you have a piece of code after you made the changes? Or did you only > record the changes in the emails you sent to me? I was hoping that you could > send me a file as an attachment, with all your suggested changes. But if I > have to go through all the emails you sent in the last few days, I guess I'll > have to do that. I keep the code in a test program and copied it to the emails. I don't want to flood this thread with more copies of it yet :-), but won't lose it. In the old emails, it has my usual markup of '% ' indentation for code and no indentation for comments so that it can easily be extracted. Diffs would be unreadable since I reformatted everything. I was hoping you would reformat your version to KNF so that diffs can be small. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120721181204.A1702>