From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Aug 5 7:16:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2225837B401; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 07:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy.centtech.com (moat.centtech.com [206.196.95.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221F743E70; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 07:16:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from sprint.centtech.com (sprint.centtech.com [10.177.173.31]) by proxy.centtech.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g75EG7904353; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:16:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by sprint.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id g75EG7729016; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:16:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from centtech.com (proton [10.177.173.77]) by sprint.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g75EG3o29009; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:16:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3D4E88A3.8060401@centtech.com> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 09:16:03 -0500 From: Eric Anderson Reply-To: anderson@centtech.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ross Lippert Cc: blackend@freebsd.org, cjuniet@entreview.com, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/41106: FreeBSD Handbook lacks "Desktop Applications" chapter. References: <200208051353.GAA15753@eskimo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ross, I think this is a great idea. I thought of something similar to this not too long ago, and was going to set up a web site with some of this on it (although you painted a much clearer picture than what I had imagined). I'd also be interested in rating ports, based on ease of use, installation, difficulty level, etc. Now, should this be a freebsd.org thing, or a "third party" site? I think it might be important to have freebsd.org officially unbiased, so maybe a third party site that freebsd.org points to would be a better idea? Eric Ross Lippert wrote: > We should really do something different than the 1-solution fits all > style of win and mac for desktops. A description of Gnome and KDE and > getting around them is great and needed, but for the other apps: mp3 > players, cd players, mpeg players, and so on I think it would be > better to have something stand-alone, where a user, who has wrestled > with getting such things to work and work well, can give an intro to a > user. > > Example: > I wrestled with mplayer, I fought with the docs, and I finally got it > working well, and now I love it, and I'd like to tell people how to > set it up with less pain than I had, if I had the forum. > > If we had a 'port testimonials' area, which was fairly free form and > allowed each one of us to talk about how to get the most from kword, > abiword, openoffice, or whatever depending on which one each of us > lived in, then that would be more beneficial to the newbie. I think it > would be fun for all of us to share our experiences with our fav ports. > > The closest thing we have right now, is the 'trawling the ports > collection' series by Greg Lehey at ezine.daemonnews.org. But he's > one guy, writing monthly, and he doesn't always even have the time to > really trick out the programs he tries. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small stain. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message