From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Oct 9 16:24:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86A6E3565F; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74BD9657EF; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id D8B79D76E; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:23:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r451553 - in head/ports-mgmt/portlint: . src Message-ID: <20171009162342.GA2723@FreeBSD.org> References: <201710081758.v98HwqIe003342@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 16:24:26 -0000 On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:07:00PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 08/10/2017 ?? 19:58, Joe Marcus Clarke a ??crit : > > New Revision: 451553 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/451553 > > > > Log: > > Update to 2.17.13. > > > > * Do not complain about USE_GITHUB before USES [1] > > This is wrong. USES= must always happen before any other USE_* variable. Not really. GitHub-related knobs are often grouped together and put closer to the top because they are more related to obtaining the distfile (think MASTER_SITES) rather than the configuring/building/etc. steps of the software in question itself. Technically there's nothing wrong with any order prior to .include's of other Mk/* files, so this kind of grouping helps readability while not affecting anything else. ./danfe