From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 21 17:50:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CD537B40C for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5M0nvri003838; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:49:57 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5M0nvvr003837; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:49:57 -0700 Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:49:57 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Mark Santcroos Cc: Brooks Davis , Julian Elischer , "David E. Cross" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: projects? Message-ID: <20020621174957.B4614@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20020620103130.B23020@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020621063715.GA94724@laptop.6bone.nl> <20020621110434.A4614@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020621230334.GA7060@laptop.6bone.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020621230334.GA7060@laptop.6bone.nl>; from marks@ripe.net on Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:03:34AM +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 01:03:34AM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:04:36AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > > For my purposes, it would need to be seperate so you could copy the > > module and hack in a new TCP without changing the existing one. >=20 > I understand, but you won't need to do that for the IP layer in your case. > Other people might have a reverse situation, so some hooks to both these > layers would come in handy, that was my point. It depends on what you're trying to do. If all you want to do is mess with in-kernel TCP implementations then just hooking into the existing IP layer is sufficent. I'm also thinking that the ability to run netgraph code in a hybrid userland/kernel environment for development would be useful in which case it would be useful to be able to implement the whole network stack in netgraph nodes. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9E8m0XY6L6fI4GtQRAj4CAJ4umh4ZyFpB+fo1zul87JnwZjlRFACfasGS hoU8x+4D2vKtrZ3ps+VJbAQ= =u2nA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message