From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 26 13:52:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5752016A4CE for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:52:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cyclades.de (mail.cyclades.de [62.225.173.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC11443D3F for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:52:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mh@kernel32.de) Received: from [192.168.10.148] (helo=[192.168.10.148]) by www.cyclades.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXgWO-00009R-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:52:24 +0100 Message-ID: <41A734BE.4060908@kernel32.de> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:50:54 +0100 From: Marian Hettwer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040928) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marian Hettwer References: <41A58384.30603@yahoo.com> <41A72F0F.90109@kernel32.de> In-Reply-To: <41A72F0F.90109@kernel32.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: cc: Rob cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 on Intel 386 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:52:30 -0000 top post: forget it. It's Friday, and I'm not tired. I just oversaw that you asked how to get FreeBSD running on a 386 then... sorry :) Marian Hettwer wrote: > Hej there, > > Rob wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I thought 386 support had been removed since 5.X. But >> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/installation-i386.html >> says: >> >> 1.2 Hardware Requirements >> FreeBSD for the i386 requires a 486 or better processor to install >> and run (although FreeBSD can run on 386 processors with a custom >> kernel).... >> >> What does this mean? > > the very same what is written down. i386 class architecture requieres to > have at least a (80)486 CPU. > >> Should I install on 486 or higher, build a custom kernel and then >> physically put the very same disk in a 386 PC? >> > I believe you are confused by i386 and 486 ... i386 is just the > architecture, often called x86 too. > 486 is the processor class itself. So: i386 != 386 > > hth, > Marian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >