From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Apr 27 7:27:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from aaz.links.ru (aaz.links.ru [193.125.152.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE9E37B925 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from babolo@links.ru) Received: (from babolo@localhost) by aaz.links.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA20691; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 18:27:36 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: <200004271427.SAA20691@aaz.links.ru> Subject: Re: Multiple PLISTs In-Reply-To: <3907FE92.9F9E5BE4@altavista.net> from "Maxim Sobolev" at "Apr 27, 0 11:47:14 am" To: sobomax@altavista.net (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 18:27:36 +0400 (MSD) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maxim Sobolev writes: > Does anyone considering a possibility to extend current bsd.port.mk to support > several PLISTs, like we are supporting several distfiles? This would greatly > simplify build-time configuration depended ports like gimp and XFree (just to > name few) and should benefit virtually all other ports supporting NOPORTDOCS > variable. > > $ find /usr/ports -name "Makefile" | xargs grep NOPORTDOCS | wc -l > 608 is it better have one full PLIST and exclude some strings when +CONTENTS generated? Based on real availability of listed files? -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message