From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 20:27:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240C01065697 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33508FC16 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24228 invoked by uid 399); 17 Sep 2010 20:27:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.142?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 17 Sep 2010 20:27:01 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C93CF16.9080607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:27:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru References: <20100908073019.GA16493@lonesome.com> <4C89107A.6050802@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy for removing working code X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:27:03 -0000 On 9/17/2010 2:14 AM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > You either not understanding that this situation is about entire project (not > ISDN, but policy) I think at this point that you've made your concerns clear. What you don't seem to be understanding is: 1) The policy is, and always has been, those who are interested in keeping code alive work on it. 2) No one was interested (by the definition above) in keeping the ISDN code alive. Now you have raised a valid point on how we can do the "volunteers needed" notifications better in the future, and I think that those will be taken to heart, and acted on the next time we face this situation. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/