Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:08:40 +0100 From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: kernel thread as real threads.. Message-ID: <200601202008.42247.thierry@herbelot.com> In-Reply-To: <20060120095214.GA11088@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43D05151.5070409@elischer.org> <43D0AB26.5070407@samsco.org> <20060120095214.GA11088@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Friday 20 January 2006 10:52, Kris Kennaway a écrit : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stats aren't accounted to the parent > process either. I'm pretty sure I've seen situations where a thread > was using a lot of CPU, but if you believe top(1) then every process > in the system is idle (except for the fact that the system is 0% > idle). In this situation there's no way to tell which threaded > process is using resources. One work-around is to "nice" the specific process (nice 1 is enough, of course), then the "nice" component of "CPU states:" seems to reflect the real CPU use of a threaded process. TfH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601202008.42247.thierry>